all - Opinion Summaries

EVETT v. DETNTFF

Civil Rights, Criminal Law & Procedure, Government Law
Sheriff deputy lacked probable cause to arrest plaintiff without further investigation and was not entitled to qualified immunity in a 42 U.S.C....

BYRNE v. AVON PRODS., INC.

Civil Rights, Health Law, Labor & Employment Law
Plaintiff's inability to work for a multi-month time period removed him from the class protected by the ADA, but plaintiff may be entitled to Family...

MORGAN v. FED. HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP.

Civil Rights, Labor & Employment Law
Plaintiff failed to make out a prima facie case in a suit alleging a federal corporation's failure to hire him for three positions, based on race and...

KING v. RUMSFELD

Civil Rights, Labor & Employment Law
Because defendant has not presented a prima facie Title VII case as to his race and sex discrimination claims and he has not overcome his employer's...

HARDY v. UNIV. OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO

Civil Rights, Education Law, Labor & Employment Law
Questions of material fact exist as to whether plaintiff unreasonably failed to avail herself of a university's sexual harassment reporting...

KUHA v. CITY OF MINNETONKA

Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & Procedure
Plaintiff's allegation that the city's police officers failed to give him a verbal warning prior to using a police dog trained to bite and hold was...

COFFMAN v. GLICKMAN

Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Civil Rights, Labor & Employment Law
A case arising from employment termination by the Department of Agriculture did not lose its "mixed" character by virtue of an Administrative Law...

HILLER v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA

Administrative Law, Civil Rights, Labor & Employment Law
Equitable considerations support permitting a Title VII employment discrimination claim to go forward despite plaintiff's inability to obtain a...

YOUNG v. JAMES GREEN MGMT., INC.

Civil Rights, Evidence, Labor & Employment Law
In a Title VII action alleging termination on account of race, 1) a letter of resignation was not admissible under Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(D), 2)...

DYKE v. O'NEAL STEEL, INC.

Civil Rights, Labor & Employment Law
An individual with monocular vision could not show that he was a qualified individual under the ADA, as he could not meet defendant's vision standards...