all - Opinion Summaries

Hillman v. Maretta

Constitutional Law, Family Law, Government Benefits, Insurance Law, Labor & Employment Law, Probate, Trusts & Estates
The Virginia State Supreme Court correctly concluded that Section D of Va. Code Ann. Section 20–111.1 is preempted by The Federal Employees' Group...

Fournier v. Sebelius

Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, Government Benefits, Health Law
The district court properly affirmed defendant's decisions denying plaintiffs' claims for Medicare coverage for dental services, where: 1) the...

Managed Pharmacy Care v. Sebelius

Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, Government Benefits, Government Law, Health Law, Property Law & Real Estate
The district court's decisions in four cases are reversed and remanded, and the preliminary injunctions prohibiting the California Department of...

California Association of Professional Scientists v. Brown

Government Benefits, Government Law
Judgments entered in favor of the plaintiff employee organizations on their claim that they are entitled to two paid holidays, Lincoln's Birthday and...

Fox Insurance Company, Inc. v. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

Administrative Law, Government Benefits, Government Contracts, Government Law, Health Law, Insurance Law
District court's judgments in favor of the federal government in an action challenging the government's immediate termination of a Medicare Part D...

Kyhn v. Shinseki

Administrative Law, Government Benefits, Health Law
The United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims erred in denying claimant's claim for service-connected tinnitus, where it lacked jurisdiction...

Parks v. Shinseki

Government Benefits, Health Law
The United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims did not err in denying service connection for claimant's asserted medical conditions that he...

Mendocino Community Health Clinic v. State Department of Health Care Services

Administrative Law, Government Benefits, Health Law
Defendant, who administers Medi-Cal, may limit payment to plaintiffs, federally-qualified health centers (FQHC's) for psychological services to two...

US v. McLean

Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence, Government Benefits, Health Law
Defendant's convictions and sentence for health care fraud and making false statements in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care...

Parra v. Pacificare of Arizona, Inc.

Government Benefits, Health Law, Injury & Tort Law, Insurance Law
The district court correctly ruled that a private Medicare Advantage Organization (MAO) plan, such as defendant, cannot sue a plan participant's...