United States Fourth Circuit

Defendant's convictions and sentence for health care fraud and making false statements in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care services, are affirmed, where: 1) the health care fraud statute is not unconstitutionally vague as applied to defendant; 2) substantial evidence supports defendant's convictions; 3) there was no due process violation in the non-disclosure of the civil settlement with the hospital; 4) the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing voir dire of defendant's expert to remedy defendant's failure to provide adequate disclosures; 5) the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding certain portions of defense expert's testimony, and even if error, it was harmless; and 6) defendant's sentence was reasonable.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/23/2013
• Published 04/23/2013

Judges

• GREGORY

Court

• United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel