Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

all - Opinion Summaries

FILL IN AT LEAST ONE FIELD

Format is YYYYMMDD

Page 22 of 23 Showing Result 211 - 220 of 228
Description Date Docket #

AM. ACAD. OF PAIN MGMT. v. JOSEPH

United States Ninth Circuit
Constitutional Law, Education Law, Ethics & Professional Responsibility, False Advertising, Health Law
California Business and Professions Code section 651(h)(5)(B), which restricts the use of the term "board certified" in physician advertisements, is...
01/02/2004 01-15764

PEOPLE v. PACIFIC BELL

Supreme Court of California
False Advertising, Public Utilities
The California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) does not have exclusive jurisdiction over all actions against a public utility, and the mere...
12/15/2003 S099131

AMMEX, INC. v. COX

United States Sixth Circuit
Constitutional Law, False Advertising
Because plaintiff's pre-enforcement challenge to the applicability of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act is not ripe, and the judgment of the...
12/03/2003 01-2392

PEOPLE v. COLE

California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, False Advertising, Health Law
The district court's order of preliminary injunction is affirmed where the court properly enjoined defendant's advertising and reversed where it erred...
11/26/2003 d040475

RICE v. FOX BROAD. CO.

United States Ninth Circuit
Copyright, False Advertising, Intellectual Property, Media Law
Disclosure of secrets behind magic tricks does not receive copyright protection, and no substantial similarity exists between plot and sequence of...
05/29/2003 01-56582/56846

NAGEL v. TWIN LABS., INC.

California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Consumer Protection Law, Drugs & Biotech, False Advertising
In a suit for violations of California's unfair competition laws and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, a product's ingredients do not satisfy the first...
05/22/2003 G030196

PARKS v. LAFACE RECORDS

United States Sixth Circuit
Entertainment Law, False Advertising, Intellectual Property, Trademark
Summary judgment was improper in Lanham Act and common law right of publicity claims, arising from use of a civil rights icon's name in the title of a...
05/12/2003 99-2495

CRUZ v. PACIFICARE HEALTH SYS., INC.

Supreme Court of California
Consumer Protection Law, Dispute Resolution & Arbitration, False Advertising, Remedies
Injunctive relief claims under the unfair competition law, and claims of false advertising under Business and Professions Code section 17500 are...
04/24/2003 S101003

INTERACTIVE PRODS. CORP. v. A2Z MOBILE OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC.

United States Sixth Circuit
Cyberspace Law, False Advertising, Intellectual Property, Trademark
Plaintiff has not presented any evidence that presence of a trademark name in the post-domain path of defendant's web page is likely to cause consumer...
04/10/2003 01-3590

AM. COUNCIL OF CERTIFIED PODIATRIC PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS

United States Sixth Circuit
Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Consumer Protection Law, False Advertising, Health Law
Claims under section 2 of the Sherman Act were not actionable where a professional association of podiatrists's statements, in extolling its virtues...
03/11/2003 01-1578

Results 211 to 220 of 228

Copied to clipboard