AMMEX, INC. v. COX, 01-2392
Because plaintiff's pre-enforcement challenge to the applicability of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act is not ripe, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/03/2003
- Published 12/03/2003
Judges
- Before BATCHELDER and ROGERS, Circuit Judges; RUSSELL, District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- David D. Smyth III (briefed), William W. Koegel, Jr., Steptoe & Johnson, Washington, DC, Craig L. John (argued), Dykema Gossett, Bloomfield Hills, MI, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Tracy A. Sonneborn (argued and briefed), Office of the Attorney General of Michigan Consumer Protection Division, Lansing, MI, for Appellee.