United States Sixth Circuit

AMMEX, INC. v. COX, 01-2392

Because plaintiff's pre-enforcement challenge to the applicability of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act is not ripe, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/03/2003
• Published 12/03/2003

Judges

• Before BATCHELDER and ROGERS, Circuit Judges;  RUSSELL, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• David D. Smyth III (briefed), William W. Koegel, Jr., Steptoe & Johnson, Washington, DC, Craig L. John (argued), Dykema Gossett, Bloomfield Hills, MI, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Tracy A. Sonneborn (argued and briefed), Office of the Attorney General of Michigan Consumer Protection Division, Lansing, MI, for Appellee.

---