Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Sixth Circuit

AMMEX, INC. v. COX, 01-2392

Because plaintiff's pre-enforcement challenge to the applicability of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act is not ripe, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/03/2003
  • Published 12/03/2003


  • Before BATCHELDER and ROGERS, Circuit Judges;  RUSSELL, District Judge.


  • United States Sixth Circuit


  • For Appellant:
  • David D. Smyth III (briefed), William W. Koegel, Jr., Steptoe & Johnson, Washington, DC, Craig L. John (argued), Dykema Gossett, Bloomfield Hills, MI, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Tracy A. Sonneborn (argued and briefed), Office of the Attorney General of Michigan Consumer Protection Division, Lansing, MI, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard