PEOPLE v. COLE, d040475
The district court's order of preliminary injunction is affirmed where the court properly enjoined defendant's advertising and reversed where it erred in allowing defendant to continue advertising optometric services with a disclaimer, and erred in enjoining defendant from charging a fee for dilating patients' eyes with eye drops.
- Decided 11/26/2003
- Published 11/26/2003
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Andrea Lynn Hoch, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Albert Norman Shelden, Robert M. Foster, Susan A. Ruff, Antoinette Cincotta, Jennifer Weck and Diane de Kervor, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Jones Day, Thomas R. Malcolm, Richard J. Grabowski, Irvine, Daniel H. Bromberg, Amar D. Sarwal and Dominick V. Freda for Defendants and Appellants Pearle Vision, Inc., et al., and Defendants and Respondents Jeffrey A. Cole et al.