all - Opinion Summaries
Page 967 of 981
Showing Result 9661 - 9670 of 9802
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
SOUDERS v. PHILIP MORRIS INC.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Injury & Tort LawUnder amended Civil Code section 1714.45, which eliminated the statutory immunity for tobacco products from products liability actions, tobacco... |
03/07/2001 | B141519 |
KATHLEEN R. v. CITY OF LIVERMORECalifornia Court of Appeal
Cyberspace Law, Injury & Tort LawA city is not subject to suit for damages or an injunction for offering unrestricted access to the Internet through computers at a public library. |
03/06/2001 | A086349 |
RANDALL v. SCOVISCalifornia Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort LawAttorney, who unlawfully obtained and disclosed opposing party's criminal investigation records in custody hearing, is not immune from invasion of... |
03/05/2001 | D036508 |
FRANKLIN v. USX CORP.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Corporation & Enterprise Law, Injury & Tort LawCorporation that purchased assets of selling corporation did not implicitly assume liabilities for successor-in-interest purposes where it also agreed... |
03/02/2001 | A091473 |
WALSH v. USUnited States First Circuit
Injury & Tort LawAbsent evidence that the snow and ice at the accident site was anything other than a "natural accumulation," Massachusetts law protects private... |
03/02/2001 | 00-1472 |
RICH PRODS. CORP. v. KEMUTEC INC.United States Seventh Circuit
Commercial Law, Contracts, Injury & Tort LawUnder the Wisconsin Economic Loss Doctrine, plaintiff lacked a cause of action in tort where, as a commercial party, it was free to apportion any risk... |
03/02/2001 | 00-1262 |
CLAMOR v. USUnited States Ninth Circuit
Injury & Tort Law, Labor & Employment Law, Military LawMilitary employee, who was off-duty when he hit plaintiff's car just before exiting a military base, was not acting within the scope of his employment... |
03/02/2001 | 00-15124 |
MILANESE v. RUST-OLEUM CORP.United States Second Circuit
Injury & Tort LawThe Federal Hazardous Substances Act, 15 USC 1261-1278, preempts any state cause of action that seeks to impose a labelling requirement on products... |
03/01/2001 | 00-7527 |
GROVER v. BAY VIEW BANKCalifornia Court of Appeal
Banking Law, Injury & Tort LawUnder California-s Enforcement of Judgments Law, Code Civ. Proc. 680.010 et seq., a levy on a spouse-s bank account without a court order requires an... |
02/28/2001 | A091772 |
FERREIRA v. GRAY, CARY, WARE & FREIDENRICHCalifornia Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort LawWhere a case is concluded by a settlement after trial, there is no favorable termination for purposes of pursuing a malicious prosecution action. |
02/28/2001 | D034678 |
Results 9661 to 9670 of 9802