Skip to main content

all - Opinion Summaries

FILL IN AT LEAST ONE FIELD

Format is YYYYMMDD

Page 199 of 210 Showing Result 1981 - 1990 of 2096
Description Date Docket #

APTIX CORP. v. QUICKTURN DESIGN SYS., INC.

United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent
Litigation misconduct, while serving as a basis to dismiss the wrongful litigant, does not invalidate the original grant of a patent.
11/07/2001 00-1468,-1469

AM. BIOSCIENCE, INC. v. THOMPSON

United States DC Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent
Under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments a new drug application patent holder's letter to FDA stating it was de-listing its drug patent to extent it was...
11/06/2001 01-5125

J & M CORP. v. HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC.

United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent
Where the prosecution history specifically points out a flaw in prior art, the claim cannot reasonably be so broad as to cover the another invention...
11/02/2001 00-1295; 00-1296; 00-1297

SUPERIOR FIREPLACE CO. v. THE MAJESTIC PRODUCTS CO.

United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent
Where the correction of an alleged mistake under 35 USC 255 broadened a claim and was not clearly evident from the specification, drawings, and...
11/01/2001 00-1233; 00-1281; 00-1282

SCALTECH, INC. v. RETEC/TETRA, L.L.C.

United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent
An offer of commercial exploitation of a process, even if no license or sale of the patent is intended, implicates the on sale bar of 35 USC 102(b),...
10/23/2001 01-1005; 01-1009

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. THOMPSON

United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent
Because 21 US 337(a) limits the ability to seek "delisting" as a form of relief to those actions "by and in the name of the United States", a private...
10/12/2001 01-1257

ASYST TECHS., INC. v. EMPAK, INC.

United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent
The corresponding structure to a function set forth in a means-plus-function limitation must actually perform the recited function, not merely enable...
10/10/2001 00-1514

BRASSELER, U.S.A. I, L.P. v. STRYKER SALES CORP.

United States Federal Circuit
Attorney's Fees, Intellectual Property, Patent
Where the inventors failed to disclose material information to their patent attorneys, and the attorneys failed to conduct an investigation adequate...
10/09/2001 00-1194

BALLARD MED. PRODS. v. ALLEGIANCE HEALTHCARE CORP.

United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent
District courts considering patent cases are not required to conduct a detailed, limitation-by-limitation construction of each of the asserted claims,...
10/09/2001 00-1393

XEROX CORP. v. 3COM CORP.

United States Federal Circuit
Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
Where the patent for single stroke symbols (used for improved computer recognition of human handwriting) relies upon both geometric shape and the...
10/05/2001 00-1464

Results 1981 to 1990 of 2096

Copied to clipboard