United States Federal Circuit
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. THOMPSON, 01-1257
Because 21 US 337(a) limits the ability to seek "delisting" as a form of relief to those actions "by and in the name of the United States", a private party may not bring a declaratory relief action under the patent laws.
Appellate Information
- Decided 10/12/2001
- Published 10/12/2001
Judges
- MAYER, Chief Judge., Before MAYER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and MICHEL, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Richard A. Samp, Washington, Legal Foundation, of Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Washington Legal Foundation. With him on the brief was Daniel J. Popeo.
- For Appellees:
- E. Anthony Figg,Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C. of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Steven M. Lieberman and Elizabeth A. Leff., Howard S. Scher, Attorney, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Stuart E. Schiffer, Acting Assistant Attorney General; and Douglas N. Letter, Attorney. Of counsel on the brief were Michael M. Landa, Acting Chief Counsel; and Kevin M. Fain, Associate Chief Counsel, Office of the Chief Counsel, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, of Rockville, MD., Evan R. Chesler, Cravath, Swaine & Moore, of New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was Richard J. Stark. Of counsel were David R. Marriott, Swaine & Moore; and Mathew D. Peterson, FoxKiser, of Washington, DC.