United States Federal Circuit
J & M CORP. v. HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC., 00-1295; 00-1296; 00-1297
Where the prosecution history specifically points out a flaw in prior art, the claim cannot reasonably be so broad as to cover the another invention with the same "flaw" under the doctrine of equivalents.
Appellate Information
- Decided 11/02/2001
- Published 11/02/2001
Judges
Court
- United States Federal Circuit