Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Federal Circuit


ASYST TECHS., INC. v. EMPAK, INC., 00-1514

The corresponding structure to a function set forth in a means-plus-function limitation must actually perform the recited function, not merely enable the pertinent structure to operate as intended, or it is not part of the limitation.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 10/10/2001
  • Published 10/10/2001

Judges

  • BRYSON, Circuit Judge., Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge, and BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Paul A. Renne,Cooley Godward LLP, of San Francisco, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   With him on the brief were Matthew B. Lehr, Lori R.E. Ploeger, and Jonathan H. Takei.   Of counsel on the brief were Darryl M. Woo, Fenwick & West, of Palo Alto, CA.

  • For Appellees:
  • Gerald H. Kiel, ReedSmith, LLP, of New York, NY, argued for defendants-appellees.   Of counsel were Stephen Chin, Eugene Ledonne, Arthur Dresner, and Richard Mario Ballerini, of ReedSmith, LLP, New York, NY.
Copied to clipboard