United States Federal Circuit
ASYST TECHS., INC. v. EMPAK, INC., 00-1514
The corresponding structure to a function set forth in a means-plus-function limitation must actually perform the recited function, not merely enable the pertinent structure to operate as intended, or it is not part of the limitation.
Appellate Information
- Decided 10/10/2001
- Published 10/10/2001
Judges
- BRYSON, Circuit Judge., Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge, and BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Paul A. Renne,Cooley Godward LLP, of San Francisco, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Matthew B. Lehr, Lori R.E. Ploeger, and Jonathan H. Takei. Of counsel on the brief were Darryl M. Woo, Fenwick & West, of Palo Alto, CA.
- For Appellees:
- Gerald H. Kiel, ReedSmith, LLP, of New York, NY, argued for defendants-appellees. Of counsel were Stephen Chin, Eugene Ledonne, Arthur Dresner, and Richard Mario Ballerini, of ReedSmith, LLP, New York, NY.