all - Opinion Summaries

KINIK CO. v. INT'L TRADE COMM'N

Intellectual Property, International Trade, Patent
Intervenors' patent was not infringed to produce certain abrasive articles imported by the appellant; the International Trade Commission's judgment of...

ARNOLD P'SHIP v. DUDAS

Drugs & Biotech, Intellectual Property, Patent
District court did not err in upholding the Patent and Trademark Office's interpretation of 35 U.S.C. section 156's "first commercial marketing"...

EXXON MOBIL CORP. v. SAUDI BASIC INDUS. CORP.

Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Oil and Gas Law, Patent
Because plaintiff's federal claims are identical to the claims in which the Delaware Superior Court reached a final judgment, the Rooker-Feldman...

SAUDI BASIC INDUS. CORP. v. EXXON CORP.

Intellectual Property, Patent, Remedies
Because the district court did not require defendant to satisfy the requisites for the injunctive relief it requested, the order enforcing the...

GLOBETROTTER SOFTWARE, INC. v. ELAN COMPUTER GROUP, INC.

Injury & Tort Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
Because plaintiff's communications asserting infringement of its patent were not objectively baseless, defendant's state-law tort and unfair...

IN RE SULLIVAN

Intellectual Property, Patent
The Board of Patent Appeals' redeclaration of the interference in this case, and its decision to terminate the interference after an early concession...

INT'L RECTIFIER CORP. v. SAMSUNG ELECS. CO., LTD.

Intellectual Property, Patent
District court erred in finding that defendant's extraterritorial conduct violates a permanent injunction on its infringing products. No proper basis...

INT'L RECTIFIER CORP. v. IXYS CORP.

Intellectual Property, Patent
Because the district court misconstrued the term "adjoining" as used in four claims of the patent, and because no reasonable jury could find those...

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO. v. PHARMACHEMIE B.V.

Drugs & Biotech, Intellectual Property, Patent
In entering final judgment of infringement, district court erred in holding that 35 U.S.C. section 121 bars defendant from asserting double patenting...

Q-PHARMA, INC. v. ANDREW JERGENS CO.

Attorney's Fees, Intellectual Property, Patent, Sanctions
District court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motions for FRCP rule 11 sanctions and attorney's fees in a patent infringement...