United States Third Circuit

Because the district court did not require defendant to satisfy the requisites for the injunctive relief it requested, the order enforcing the parties' private stipulation agreement is vacated; remanded for a hearing to resolve that agreement's disputed terms before determining whether injunctive relief should issue.

Appellate Information

• Argued 12/09/2003
• Decided 03/24/2004
• Published 03/24/2004

Judges

• Before AMBRO, FUENTES and CHERTOFF, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Gregory A. Castanias (Argued), Jack W. Campbell IV, William K. Shirey II, Jones Day, Washington, DC, Kenneth R. Adamo, Michael W. Vary, Leozino Agozzino, Jones Day, North Point, Cleveland, OH, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Elizabeth J. Sher, Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch, Morristown, NJ, James W. Quinn (Argued), David J. Lender, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, New York City, Andrew S. Pollis, David J. Michalski, Hahn, Loeser & Parks, Cleveland, OH, K.C. Johnson, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Houston, TX, for Appellees.