Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas - March 2004 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 2
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 13
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
WHITEHEAD v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & ProcedureTrial court abused its discretion when it refused to permit defense attorney to withdraw after the indigence question was decided. The indigence... |
03/31/2004 | 2077-02 |
| 03/24/2004 | 0413-02 | |
EX PARTE NAILORCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas CorpusSpecific allegations of deficient attorney performance that were rejected on direct appeal are not cognizable on habeas corpus as a part of a larger... |
03/24/2004 | 1109-03 |
GARCIA v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & ProcedureWhen a trial judge is aware that the defendant has a problem understanding English, the judge has an independent duty, absent a knowing and voluntary... |
03/24/2004 | 489-03 |
BAILEY v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingDefendant's appeal from a restitution order imposed as a condition of probation was improperly dismissed as untimely. Because his sentence was... |
03/24/2004 | 2189-01 |
STATE OF TEXAS v. GUTIERREZCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingArticle 44.01(a)(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, providing that the State may appeal a trial court's order if the order "modifies a judgment,"... |
03/10/2004 | 1592-03 |
NELSON v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & ProcedureDefendant's conviction was improperly reversed on grounds that one juror was absolutely disqualified per Code of Criminal Procedure Article 35.19.... |
03/10/2004 | 0950-03 |
WEAD v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & ProcedureDenial of defendant's motion for mistrial was not an abuse of discretion. The prosecutor's comment in court, taken literally, concerned defendant's... |
03/10/2004 | 0020-03 |
SAUCEDA v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & Procedure, EvidenceThe Court of Appeals erred by upholding a trial court ruling that, under the rule of optional completeness, simply asking a question for impeachment... |
03/10/2004 | 612-02 |
MITSCHKE v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & ProcedureThe trial court's failure to admonish defendant as to the sex offender registration requirement at the time of pleading did not violate due process or... |
03/10/2004 | 2243-01 |
Results 1 to 10 of 13