Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

The Court of Appeals erred by upholding a trial court ruling that, under the rule of optional completeness, simply asking a question for impeachment purposes rendered admissible an entire videotaped interview containing numerous references to uncharged offenses. (Substituted opinion)

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/10/2003
• Published 03/10/2004

Judges

• Before the Court en banc.

Court

• Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Shawna L. Reagin, Houston, for Appellant., Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Asst. DA, Houston, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for State.