Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas - March 2002 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 2
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 12
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
WILEY v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & ProcedureThe defendant was not deprived of his Sixth Amendment right to present a defense when the court excluded portions of his sworn statement to an... |
03/27/2002 | 1778-00 |
FULLER v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & ProcedureThe victim's name is not a statutory element of the offense of "injury to an elderly individual," and where there was no indication the defendant was... |
03/27/2002 | 1283-98 |
WILSON v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing, EvidenceBecause a defense witness was testifying as to his opinion of the defendant, the State was entitled to test his knowledge of defendant by asking "did... |
03/20/2002 | 73,747 |
PUENTE v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & ProcedureWhere a defendant pleads guilty to one indictment that misjoins a felony charge and two misdemeanor charges, he is not entitled to have his entire... |
03/20/2002 | 1364-01 |
EX PARTE RICHARDSONCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas CorpusBecause the credibility of the State's only eyewitness was a crucial issue at trial, the State had an affirmative constitutional duty under Brady v.... |
03/13/2002 | 74,221 |
EX PARTE PENACourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas CorpusA claim that a judgment is inaccurate, which is neither a claim of jurisdictional defect nor of a violation of constitutional or fundamental rights,... |
03/13/2002 | 74,035 |
SALDANO v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & ProcedureOn remand from the US Supreme Court on the issue of whether a defendant's race or ethnic background may ever be used as an aggravating circumstance in... |
03/13/2002 | 72,556 |
HATTEN v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & ProcedureThe requirements of Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 807 (1975), are not invoked by a misdemeanor defendant who waives his right to representation... |
03/13/2002 | 2042-00 |
SMITH v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & ProcedureA court's awareness of the terms of an immunity agreement is not required to make it enforceable. |
03/13/2002 | 1862-98 |
WILLOVER v. STATE OF TEXASCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & ProcedureWhere videotapes contained both admissible and inadmissible evidence, it was the defendant's responsibility to specify and extract the statements he... |
03/13/2002 | 746-01 |
Results 1 to 10 of 12