Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Where videotapes contained both admissible and inadmissible evidence, it was the defendant's responsibility to specify and extract the statements he wanted to use for impeachment purposes, and since he did not do so, it was not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to exclude the videotapes.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/13/2002
• Published 03/13/2002

Judges

Court

• Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Toni Aninao, Houston, for Appellant., Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Betty Marshall, Assistant State's Attorney, Austin, for the State.