Supreme Court of California - July 2003 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 2
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 12
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
PEOPLE v. MONTESSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingPenal Code section 186.22(b)(5), providing that a defendant who commits "a felony punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for life" for the... |
07/31/2003 | S105781 |
PEOPLE v. SANDERSSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureWhere police searched the residence of two persons, one of whom was on parole and subject to a search condition of which the police were unaware at... |
07/31/2003 | S094088 |
PEOPLE v. SAPPSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingA first degree murder conviction, special circumstance findings of multiple murder and murder for financial gain, and a death sentence are affirmed on... |
07/31/2003 | S023628 |
PEOPLE v. MARKSSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingMurder conviction and imposition of the death penalty are affirmed on automatic appeal over multiple arguments, including as to defendant's competency... |
07/24/2003 | S040575 |
PEOPLE v. FLOYDSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingThe savings clause of the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000 indicates the Act was not intended to apply retroactively to defendants who... |
07/21/2003 | S105225 |
PEOPLE v. YEOMANSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingOn automatic appeal, murder conviction and imposition of death sentence are affirmed over numerous guilt and penalty phase arguments, including 1)... |
07/17/2003 | S016719 |
GUILLORY v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY (PEOPLE)Supreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, Juvenile LawA minor may be prosecuted by way of grand jury indictment under Welf. & Inst. Code section 602(b), mandating prosecution in adult criminal court... |
07/17/2003 | S109642 |
PEOPLE v. NEALSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureUnder the surrounding circumstances, including 1) an officer's deliberate violation of Miranda, 2) defendant's youth, inexperience, minimal education,... |
07/14/2003 | S106440 |
IN RE CELINE R.Supreme Court of California
Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Family LawThe juvenile court may reject adoption under the Welf. & Inst. Code section 366.26 sibling relationship provision only if it finds adoption would... |
07/07/2003 | S111138 |
FERNANDEZ v. LAWSONSupreme Court of California
Labor & Employment Law, Property Law & Real EstateA homeowner who hires someone to trim a tree in his yard was not required to comply with the tree trimming regulations set forth in California... |
07/07/2003 | S107521 |
Results 1 to 10 of 12