all - Opinion Summaries
Page 68 of 87
Showing Result 671 - 680 of 864
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY (FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION)California Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law, Indian LawThe Fair Political Practices Commission can sue a federally recognized Indian tribe to enforce California law regarding the reporting of political... |
03/03/2004 | C043716 |
US v. BIRDUnited States Ninth Circuit
Civil Procedure, Criminal Law & Procedure, Indian LawInterlocutory appeal, seeking dismissal of Major Crimes Act indictments for failure to allege that the victim is an Indian, is dismissed for lack of... |
03/03/2004 | 02-30246, 02-30282 |
CHICKALOON-MOOSE CREEK NATIVE ASS'N, INC. v. NORTONUnited States Ninth Circuit
Indian Law, Property Law & Real EstateUnder the unambiguous terms of the 1976 Deficiency Agreement between the Department of the Interior and an Alaska Native corporation, pursuant to... |
02/26/2004 | 01-35921 |
KRYSTAL ENERGY CO. v. NAVAJO NATIONUnited States Ninth Circuit
Bankruptcy Law, Indian LawBecause Indian tribes are domestic governments, their sovereign immunity is congressionally abrogated by Bankruptcy Code sections 106(a) and 101(27). |
02/10/2004 | 02-17047 |
DEMERY v. US DEP'T OF THE INTERIORUnited States Eighth Circuit
Government Law, Indian Law, Injury & Tort LawBureau of Indian Affairs' decisions to aerate Belcourt Lake and to erect what may have been inadequate warnings, when there was no Bureau directive... |
02/06/2004 | 03-1787 |
IN RE LILIANA S.California Court of Appeal
Family Law, Indian LawBecause the juvenile court placed the children with a member of their extended family, it was not required to find good cause to modify the mandatory... |
02/04/2004 | D042428 |
BONNICHSEN v. USUnited States Ninth Circuit
Indian LawBecause Kennewick Man's 9,000-year-old remains have not been shown to be related to a presently existing tribe, people or culture, they are not... |
02/04/2004 | 02-35994, 02-35996 |
DELORME v. USUnited States Eighth Circuit
Indian LawPlaintiff, on behalf of the Little Shell Band of Indians, failed to demonstrate actual injury, and thus lacked standing to challenge two congressional... |
01/13/2004 | 02-3460 |
ARTICHOKE JOE'S CALIFORNIA GRAND CASINO v. NORTONUnited States Ninth Circuit
Constitutional Law, Indian Law, Gaming LawThe Indian Gaming Regulatory Act allows the State of California to grant a monopoly on casino-style gaming to the Indian tribes. The monopoly granted... |
12/22/2003 | 02-16508 |
CITY OF ROSEVILLE v. NORTONUnited States DC Circuit
Indian LawDismissal affirmed where under The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act the Auburn Tribe's land qualifies as the restoration of lands and therefore, defendant... |
11/14/2003 | 02-5277 |
Results 671 to 680 of 864