all - Opinion Summaries
Page 339 of 393
Showing Result 3381 - 3390 of 3928
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
DENNY'S, INC. v. WORKERS' COMP. APPEALS BD.California Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort Law, Insurance Law, Labor & Employment Law, Workers' CompensationAn employee's injury claim was outside a guarantor's indemnification responsibility, where the employer made the business decision to opt for... |
01/07/2003 | F039621 |
INDIANA INS. CO. v. PANA COMMUNITY UNIT SCH. DIST. NUMBER 8United States Seventh Circuit
Contracts, Insurance Law, Property Law & Real EstateIn interpreting a blanket insurance policy, the district court properly found that a building was never insured under blanket coverage, and a "zero"... |
12/31/2002 | 02-1500/01 |
TRAN v. FARMERS GROUP, INC.California Court of Appeal
Contracts, Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Injury & Tort Law, Insurance LawAn attorney-in-fact, acting as an insurer's managerial agent and deriving its authority from a power of attorney executed by an insured, owed the... |
12/27/2002 | A093437 |
NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC. v. ONTARIO AIRCRAFT SERVS., INC.California Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort Law, Insurance LawAn insurer's failure to comply with its obligation by regulation, to inform a third party claimant of the statutory time limits pertaining to a claim,... |
12/24/2002 | B156158 |
POWERINE OIL CO., INC. v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY (CENTRAL NAT'L INS. CO.)California Court of Appeal
Contracts, Corporation & Enterprise Law, Environmental Law, Insurance Law, Property Law & Real EstateIndemnification language in excess/umbrella liability policies obligated an insurer to indemnify its insured for expenses incurred in responding to... |
12/23/2002 | B156216 |
SCIREX CORP. v. FED. INS. CO.United States Third Circuit
Health Law, Insurance LawA drug testing firm was entitled to payment under a "Blanket Employee Dishonesty" Policy, for firm employees' dishonest acts during clinical trials... |
12/23/2002 | 02-1172 |
HILLENBRAND v. INS. CO. OF N. AM.California Court of Appeal
Corporation & Enterprise Law, Injury & Tort Law, Insurance Law, Labor & Employment Law, RemediesA jury's finding of an insurance company's malicious prosecution of two lawsuits is supported by substantial evidence. Civil Code section 2351 does... |
12/20/2002 | C030059 |
INSUA v. SCOTTSDALE INS. CO.California Court of Appeal
Contracts, Insurance Law, Property Law & Real EstateAn insurer was not precluded by Insurance Code section 554 from denying liability for pre-tender expenses incurred to defend an underlying action,... |
12/20/2002 | B155799 |
GREEN MACHINE CORP. v. THE ZURICH-AM. INS. GROUPUnited States Third Circuit
Insurance Law, Intellectual Property, PatentAn insurer had no duty defend and indemnify a corporation in an underlying patent infringement action, as the claims did not fall within "advertising... |
12/20/2002 | 01-3635 |
KAPSIMALLIS v. ALLSTATE INS. CO.California Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort Law, Insurance Law, Property Law & Real EstateThe analysis in Prudential-LMI Com. Insurance v. Superior Court, 51 Cal.3d 674 (1990), was fully applicable to a bad faith insurance case involving... |
12/19/2002 | B156359 |
Results 3381 to 3390 of 3928