Skip to main content

all - Opinion Summaries

FILL IN AT LEAST ONE FIELD

Format is YYYYMMDD

Page 339 of 393 Showing Result 3381 - 3390 of 3928
Description Date Docket #

DENNY'S, INC. v. WORKERS' COMP. APPEALS BD.

California Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort Law, Insurance Law, Labor & Employment Law, Workers' Compensation
An employee's injury claim was outside a guarantor's indemnification responsibility, where the employer made the business decision to opt for...
01/07/2003 F039621

INDIANA INS. CO. v. PANA COMMUNITY UNIT SCH. DIST. NUMBER 8

United States Seventh Circuit
Contracts, Insurance Law, Property Law & Real Estate
In interpreting a blanket insurance policy, the district court properly found that a building was never insured under blanket coverage, and a "zero"...
12/31/2002 02-1500/01

TRAN v. FARMERS GROUP, INC.

California Court of Appeal
Contracts, Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Injury & Tort Law, Insurance Law
An attorney-in-fact, acting as an insurer's managerial agent and deriving its authority from a power of attorney executed by an insured, owed the...
12/27/2002 A093437

NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC. v. ONTARIO AIRCRAFT SERVS., INC.

California Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort Law, Insurance Law
An insurer's failure to comply with its obligation by regulation, to inform a third party claimant of the statutory time limits pertaining to a claim,...
12/24/2002 B156158

POWERINE OIL CO., INC. v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY (CENTRAL NAT'L INS. CO.)

California Court of Appeal
Contracts, Corporation & Enterprise Law, Environmental Law, Insurance Law, Property Law & Real Estate
Indemnification language in excess/umbrella liability policies obligated an insurer to indemnify its insured for expenses incurred in responding to...
12/23/2002 B156216

SCIREX CORP. v. FED. INS. CO.

United States Third Circuit
Health Law, Insurance Law
A drug testing firm was entitled to payment under a "Blanket Employee Dishonesty" Policy, for firm employees' dishonest acts during clinical trials...
12/23/2002 02-1172

HILLENBRAND v. INS. CO. OF N. AM.

California Court of Appeal
Corporation & Enterprise Law, Injury & Tort Law, Insurance Law, Labor & Employment Law, Remedies
A jury's finding of an insurance company's malicious prosecution of two lawsuits is supported by substantial evidence. Civil Code section 2351 does...
12/20/2002 C030059

INSUA v. SCOTTSDALE INS. CO.

California Court of Appeal
Contracts, Insurance Law, Property Law & Real Estate
An insurer was not precluded by Insurance Code section 554 from denying liability for pre-tender expenses incurred to defend an underlying action,...
12/20/2002 B155799

GREEN MACHINE CORP. v. THE ZURICH-AM. INS. GROUP

United States Third Circuit
Insurance Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
An insurer had no duty defend and indemnify a corporation in an underlying patent infringement action, as the claims did not fall within "advertising...
12/20/2002 01-3635

KAPSIMALLIS v. ALLSTATE INS. CO.

California Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort Law, Insurance Law, Property Law & Real Estate
The analysis in Prudential-LMI Com. Insurance v. Superior Court, 51 Cal.3d 674 (1990), was fully applicable to a bad faith insurance case involving...
12/19/2002 B156359

Results 3381 to 3390 of 3928

Copied to clipboard