all - Opinion Summaries
Page 138 of 141
Showing Result 1371 - 1380 of 1406
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
TRW INC. v. ANDREWSUnited States Supreme Court
Consumer Protection LawThe statute of limitations under 15 USC 1681p of the Fair Credit Reporting Act starts to run when the reporting agency made the erroneous report and... |
11/13/2001 | 00-1045 |
CARRAU v. MARVIN LUMBER & CEDAR CO.California Court of Appeal
Consumer Protection LawThe "future performance" exception to the four-year limitations period for breach of warranty claims, under Commercial Code section 2725, applies only... |
10/26/2001 | A091121, A091880 |
FIRST HEALTH GROUP CORP. v. BCE EMERGIS CORP.United States Seventh Circuit
Consumer Protection Law, Health Law, Intellectual Property, TrademarkBecause some confusion and misunderstanding are inevitable in any business relation, the Lanham Act deals only with confusion that exceeds the norm in... |
10/16/2001 | 00-3833 |
BLACK v. FIN. FREEDOM SENIOR FUNDING CORP.California Court of Appeal
Banking Law, Consumer Protection LawThe Alternative Mortgage Transaction Parity Act of 1982, 12 USC 3801-3806, and the Truth in Lending Act 15 USC 1601-1667f do not preempt a state law... |
10/05/2001 | A092156 |
FED. TRADE COMM'N v. GILLUnited States Ninth Circuit
Commercial Law, Consumer Protection LawCredit Repair Organizations Act prohibits a Credit Repair Organization from collecting a deposit before fully performing credit repair services. |
09/12/2001 | 00-55122; 00-55123 |
CLAY v. JOHNSONUnited States Seventh Circuit
Banking Law, Consumer Protection LawThe Truth in Lending Act, 15 USC 1601 et seq., allows for disclosure of a monthly payment schedule based upon the completion of some event rather than... |
09/05/2001 | 00-1203 |
PRATA v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY (BANK ONE)California Court of Appeal
Consumer Protection LawA cause of action asserting that a bank was responsible for false and misleading advertising is suitable as a representative action, even though there... |
08/27/2001 | B146295 |
THRIFTY OIL CO. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY (LINDER)California Court of Appeal
Consumer Protection LawEvidence that gas station had to pay fee to credit card company for credit purchases is sufficient to support claim that charging less for cash... |
08/24/2001 | B149357 |
RANDAZZO v. HARRIS BANK PALATINE, N.A.United States Seventh Circuit
Consumer Protection LawThe voluntary payment doctrine precludes a plaintiff from recovering money paid under a misunderstanding about his legal rights when he was relying on... |
08/21/2001 | 00-2915 |
OREGEL v. AM. ISUZU MOTORS, INC.California Court of Appeal
Consumer Protection LawUnder the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, Civil Code section 1790 et seq., evidence that dealer's mechanics could not find the source of a leak on... |
07/23/2001 | D036615 |
Results 1371 to 1380 of 1406