BLACK v. FIN. FREEDOM SENIOR FUNDING CORP., A092156
The Alternative Mortgage Transaction Parity Act of 1982, 12 USC 3801-3806, and the Truth in Lending Act 15 USC 1601-1667f do not preempt a state law claim alleging unfair and deceptive business practices in marketing reverse mortgages to senior citizens.
- Decided 10/05/2001
- Published 10/05/2001
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Dario de Ghetaldi,George R. Corey, Millbrae, Corey, Luzaich, Manos & Pliska LLP, Attorneys for Appellant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Richard M. Frank, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Herschel T. Elkins, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Ronald Reiter, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Michele R. Van Gelderen, Deputy Attorney General, Attorney General for the State of California as Amicus Curiae.
- For Appellees:
- James H. Fleming, Edward Romero, Walnut Creek, Fleming & Phillips, LLP, Attorneys for Respondents (Financial Freedom Senior Funding Corp., Beverly Mirtle, MRCo., ULLICO, Inc., Union Labor Life Insurance Co.)., Michael P. Verna, Walnut Creek, Donald A. Velez, Lawrence D. Goldberg, Bowles & Verna, Attorneys for Respondent (James R. Mahoney).