California Court of Appeal

A cause of action asserting that a bank was responsible for false and misleading advertising is suitable as a representative action, even though there were many separate advertisements for the program in question.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/27/2001
• Published 08/27/2001

Judges

• EPSTEIN, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
•  Patricio T.D. Barrera, Los Angeles, for Petitioner., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Richard M. Frank, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Herschel T. Elkins, Assistant Attorney General, Ronald Reiter and  Joseph Ragazzo, Deputy Attorneys General for the State of California as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioner., Morrison & Foerster, Robert S. Stern, John Sobieski and Camilo Echavarria, Los Angeles, for Real Party in Interest.


• For Appellees:
  
• No appearance for Respondent.