all - Opinion Summaries
Page 26 of 42
Showing Result 251 - 260 of 420
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
Stone v. Ctr. Trust Retail Props., Inc.California Court of Appeal
Commercial Law, Injury & Tort Law, Property Law & Real EstateA six-figure damage award to plaintiff for physical injuries she suffered at a restaurant in defendant-commercial landlord's mall is reversed and... |
01/23/2007 | B181180 |
Shisler v. Sanfer Sports Cars, Inc.California Court of Appeal
Civil ProcedureGrant of defendant's motion to quash service of summons for lack of personal jurisdiction, in case involving purchase by plaintiff California resident... |
01/18/2007 | H029791 |
Retail Indus. Leaders Ass'ns v. FielderUnited States Fourth Circuit
Administrative Law, ERISA, Health Law, Insurance Law, Labor & Employment LawSummary judgment for plaintiffs, declaring that ERISA preempts Maryland's Fair Share Health Care Fund Act, which requires employers with 10,000 or... |
01/17/2007 | 06-1840, 06-1901 |
Gen. Motors Corp. v. State of Illinois Motor Vehicle Review Bd.Supreme Court of Illinois
Administrative Law, Commercial LawIn an appeal from a decision of the Motor Vehicle Review Board to not allow two new General Motors dealerships in the Chicago area, the decision is... |
01/08/2007 | 101585, 101601cons. |
Bed, Bath & Beyond, Inc. v. UristaSupreme Court of Texas
Civil Procedure, Injury & Tort LawIn an action brought by a shopper at Bed, Bath & Beyond (BBB) who claimed he was injured by falling merchandise at a store, a court of appeals'... |
12/29/2006 | 04-0332 |
Castural Thompson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.United States Eighth Circuit
Attorney's Fees, Civil Rights, Commercial LawIn a 42 U.S.C. section 1981 action alleging race discrimination against Wal-Mart, denial of Wal-Mart's claim for attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. section... |
12/27/2006 | 05-4438 |
Galeno v. Blockbuster, Inc.United States Second Circuit
Civil Procedure, Class Actions, Consumer Protection LawDenial of motion to remand a class action -- involving disgruntled customers of Blockbuster alleging that the "no late fee" program is a decptive... |
12/26/2006 | 05-8019 |
Galeno v. Blockbuster, Inc.United States Second Circuit
Civil Procedure, Class Actions, Consumer Protection LawDenial of motion to remand a class action -- involving disgruntled customers of Blockbuster alleging that the "no late fee" program is a decptive... |
12/26/2006 | 05-8019 |
Galeno v. Blockbuster, Inc.United States Second Circuit
Civil Procedure, Class Actions, Consumer Protection LawDenial of motion to remand a class action -- involving disgruntled customers of Blockbuster alleging that the "no late fee" program is a decptive... |
12/26/2006 | 05-8019 |
Galeno v. Blockbuster, Inc.United States Second Circuit
Civil Procedure, Class Actions, Consumer Protection LawDenial of motion to remand class action -- involving disgruntled customers of Blockbuster alleging that the "no late fee" program is a decptive forced... |
12/26/2006 | 05-8019 |
Results 251 to 260 of 420