all - Opinion Summaries
Page 2 of 3
Showing Result 11 - 20 of 21
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
US v. DevegterUnited States Eleventh Circuit
Criminal Law & Procedure, Government Law, SentencingDefendants' sentences for wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud involving a bribery scheme are vacated due to Booker sentencing error, error... |
02/16/2006 | 04-14075 |
Black Historical Soc'y v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal
Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Construction, Government Law, Property Law & Real Estate, SanctionsDismissal of plaintiff's petition challenging defendant's approval of a low income housing development on a site with historical significance is... |
12/01/2005 | D045481 |
STATE OF FLORIDA v. T.H. ORLANDO LTD.United States Eleventh Circuit
Banking Law, Bankruptcy Law, Property Law & Real EstateIn a case concerning an outstanding mortgage balance, defendant's claim for a refund of stamp and intangible taxes is granted where the transfer at... |
12/01/2004 | 04-10012 |
D'ORSAY INT'L PARTNERS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Court of Appeal
Construction, Contracts, Property Law & Real EstateIn a suit for breach of a construction contract, the trial court erred by not releasing a mechanic's lien outright where, for a mechanic's lien to... |
10/29/2004 | B174411 |
US v. CASINO MAGIC CORP.United States Eighth Circuit
Gaming Law, Indian Law, RemediesIn an appeal of an award of damages for alleged illegal casino contracts, the district court properly calculated damages with respect to borrowing... |
09/13/2004 | 03-3043 |
CITY OF BURBANK v. BURBANK-GLENDALE-PASADENA AIRPORT AUTH.California Court of Appeal
Property Law & Real EstateJudgment affirmed finding initiative measure invalid. The court found the measure an inappropriate subject for an initiative and further found its... |
11/19/2003 | B162667 |
SEHULSTER TUNNELS/PRE-CON v. TRAYLOR BROTHERS, INC../OBAYASHI CORP.California Court of Appeal
Construction, ContractsIn an action arising out of an underwater tunnel project, because the City did not breach its contract with defendant, as a matter of law City cannot... |
09/12/2003 | D036734 |
HORNEFF v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCOCalifornia Court of Appeal
ElectionsThough the trial court erred in issuing a writ of mandate, pursuant to Elections Code section 92951 amending the digest prepared by the Ballot... |
07/18/2003 | A100742 |
GOODMAN v. WILLIAMSCalifornia Court of Appeal
The Improvement Act of 1911 allows the holder of a newly-apportioned improvement bond to maintain a foreclosure action, based on unpaid apportioned... |
03/21/2003 | B156080 |
THE LEGACY GROUP v. CITY OF WASCOCalifornia Court of Appeal
Contracts, Property Law & Real EstateA cause of action for breach of a development agreement is not subject to the 90-day statute of limitations contained in Government Code section... |
03/13/2003 | F038382 |
Results 11 to 20 of 21