California Court of Appeal

Though the trial court erred in issuing a writ of mandate, pursuant to Elections Code section 92951 amending the digest prepared by the Ballot Simplification Committee of Proposition A, a revenue bond measure, the error (omission of any reference to contingency financing) does not require reversal.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/18/2003
• Published 07/18/2003

Judges

• STEIN, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
•  Dennis J. Herrera, City Attorney, Randy Riddle, Rafal Ofierski, Deputy City Attorneys, for Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor, John E. Mueller, James R. Parrinello, Mill Valley, for Respondent.