United States Sixth Circuit - Opinion Summaries
Page 394 of 439
Showing Result 3931 - 3940 of 4382
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
STEELTECH, LTD. v. US ENVTL. PROT. AGENCYUnited States Sixth Circuit
Environmental LawUnder the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, 42 USC 11001-11050, calculating the civil penalty by means of the Environmental Response... |
11/28/2001 | 00-2008 |
US v. TURNERUnited States Sixth Circuit
Criminal Law & ProcedureEvidence that defendants robbed a victim who ran an illegal lottery out of his home is insufficient to show an affect on interstate commerce under the... |
11/28/2001 | 99-1640, 99-1762, 99-2013 |
US v. KINGUnited States Sixth Circuit
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingThe means by which guilt is determined, whether a plea bargain or guilty verdict, does not affect a court's plain error review of an Apprendi error. |
11/27/2001 | 00-5271, 00-5383 |
BOVEE v. COOPERS & LYBRAND C.P.A.United States Sixth Circuit
Civil Procedure, Securities LawA court should consider a plaintiff's amended complaint when determining whether to dismiss it where amended complaint has substantially more detail. |
11/21/2001 | 00-3018, 00-3471 |
US v. SAARIUnited States Sixth Circuit
Criminal Law & ProcedurePointing a gun at defendant standing in the entrance of his apartment and ordering him to exit the apartment is an arrest, not an investigative stop... |
11/21/2001 | 00-5061 |
IN RE: SWALLEN'S, INC.United States Sixth Circuit
Bankruptcy LawBankruptcy court does not have the authority, over the objections of creditors, to order distribution of the assets of an estate under 11 USC 507 in... |
11/19/2001 | 01-8036, 01-8037 |
GROSS v. COMM'R OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Sixth Circuit
Tax LawTax affecting unavailable to discount value of S-corporation stocks in gift tax calculation prior to 1992. |
11/19/2001 | 99-2239, 99-2257 |
BULLS v. JONESUnited States Sixth Circuit
Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas CorpusErroneous admission of non-testifying co-defendant's testimony that everything would be fine as long as another co-defendant did not kill victim,... |
11/19/2001 | 00-1289 |
CORNIST v. B.J.T. AUTO SALES, INC.United States Sixth Circuit
Consumer Protection LawUnder the Truth in Lending Act, 15 USC 1601 et seq., the "systematic" disparity requirement is not an element of the cause of action for undisclosed... |
11/16/2001 | 00-5751 |
MAXIMUM HOME HEALTH CARE, INC. v. SHALALAUnited States Sixth Circuit
Health LawUnder 42 USC 1395x(v)(1)(A) of the Medicare Act, the prudent buyer concept does not include competitive bidding as a component for determining whether... |
11/15/2001 | 00-6240 |
Results 3931 to 3940 of 4382