United States Sixth Circuit

A court should consider a plaintiff's amended complaint when determining whether to dismiss it where amended complaint has substantially more detail.

Appellate Information

• Argued 04/26/2001
• Decided 11/21/2001
• Published 11/21/2001

Judges

• Before:  BOGGS and CLAY, Circuit Judges;  ROBERTS, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Michael G. Brautigam (argued and briefed), Gene Mesh & Associates, Cincinnati, OH, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• David W. Hardymon, David S. Cupps (argued and briefed), Robert N. Webner (briefed), Michelle M. Gubola, Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Columbus, OH, for Defendants-Appellees., ON BRIEF:  Michael G. Brautigam, Gene Mesh & Associates, Cincinnati, OH, for Appellants.  David S. Cupps, Robert N. Webner, Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Columbus, OH, for Appellees.