California Court of Appeal - Opinion Summaries
Page 1474 of 1687
Showing Result 14731 - 14740 of 16863
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
PEOPEL v. ESPARZACalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingDefendant was ineligible for Proposition 36 treatment on a nondrug-related felony, even though the drug possession felony was the cause of his... |
04/01/2003 | C040863 |
PEOPLE v. SMITHCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, EvidenceEven if the mixed sample deoxyribonucleic acid evidence was improperly admitted, any resultant error was harmless, and defendant's forcible rape... |
04/01/2003 | B153102 |
PEOPLE v. WHITECalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, TransportationOfficer's error of law, that Arizona issues two license plates per car, though made in good faith, cannot form the basis for a vehicle stop. Evidence... |
04/01/2003 | A094900, A096512 |
CORONA v. AMHERST PARTNERSCalifornia Court of Appeal
Attorney's Fees, Dispute Resolution & ArbitrationWhere a party is required by contract to submit a dispute to binding arbitration, but does not request that the arbitrator decide his entitlement to... |
04/01/2003 | D040084 |
HIRSCH v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.California Court of Appeal
Banking Law, Property Law & Real EstatePlaintiffs' unjust enrichment claims with respect to the banks' excessive and unjustified fees passed on to them survives demurrer without deciding... |
03/28/2003 | A096725/6/7/8 |
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL 1277 v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY METRO. TRANSP. AUTH.California Court of Appeal
Attorney's Fees, Labor & Employment Law, Workers' CompensationIn a suit on behalf of an injured employee seeking reinstatemnt and back pay, (1) the Workers' Compensation Act is not an exclusive remedy that would... |
03/28/2003 | B153994 |
RODEN v. BERGEN BRUNSWIG CORP.California Court of Appeal
Attorney's Fees, Civil Procedure, Contracts, Labor & Employment LawIn a hastily drawn settlement agreement, under Code of Civil Procedure section 998, continuing retirement benefits are to be provided to the plaintiff... |
03/28/2003 | G029574 |
CHAVERS v. GATKE CORP.California Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort Law, Product LiabilityA manufacturer of friction brake products containing asbestos, cannot be held liable in tort to plaintiffs for injuries caused by asbestos inhalation... |
03/28/2003 | A092551 |
PEOPLE EX REL. ALLSTATE INS. CO. v. WEITZMANCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Insurance LawInsurance Code section 1871.7(h)(2) does not jurisdictionally bar plaintiff from pursuing the present case for insurance fraud, over defendants'... |
03/27/2003 | B151252 |
CONSUMER JUSTICE CTR. v. TRIMEDICA INT'L, INC.California Court of Appeal
Constitutional LawClaims that a product that offers "The All-Natural Way To A Fuller, More Beautiful Bust!" do not constitute speech on a matter of "public interest"... |
03/27/2003 | G029800 |
Results 14731 to 14740 of 16863