United States Federal Circuit - March 2002 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 2
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 19
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
RUSSO v. US POSTAL SERV.United States Federal Circuit
Labor & Employment LawThe Merit Systems Protection Board (Board) will sustain a general charge of misconduct when it finds that an employee engaged in inappropriate... |
03/28/2002 | 01-3154 |
NOVOSTEEL SA v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
International TradeThe omission of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States ("HTUS") number for a profile slab does not mean that a duty order necessarily... |
03/27/2002 | 01-1274 |
LAPUH v. MERIT SYS. PROT. BD.United States Federal Circuit
Government Benefits, Labor & Employment LawWhere plaintiff averred she was denied veterans' preference rights, which resulted in her not being hired by the postal service in 1994, the Board... |
03/21/2002 | 01-3317 |
TURTLE ISLAND RESTORATION NETWORK v. EVANSUnited States Federal Circuit
Admiralty, Environmental LawThe government's decision to permit the importation of shrimp caught with Turtle Excluder Devices (TED) from uncertified nations is in accordance with... |
03/21/2002 | 00-1569, 00-1581, 00 -1582 |
FUJITSU GEN. AMERICA, INC. v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
International TradeGovernment's failure to timely publish notice of Court of International Trade's decision within the statutory deadline for the liquidation of entries... |
03/20/2002 | 01-1042 |
WALLACE v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MGMT.United States Federal Circuit
Government Benefits, Labor & Employment LawThe Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C section 5596, does not authorize the payment of interest on back payments of retirement benefits. |
03/18/2002 | 01-3274 |
IN RE: GLAUGUnited States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentBoard of Patent Appeals' decision, rejecting all claims of patent application for elastic training pants, reversed, where the placement of adhesive in... |
03/18/2002 | 00-1571 |
GALLEGOS v. PRINCIPIUnited States Federal Circuit
Government BenefitsBecause 38 C.F.R. section 20.201, a VA regulation setting minimum requirements for a notice of disagreement (NOD), is not procedurally defective,... |
03/15/2002 | 01-7037 |
BOEING N. AM., INC. v. ROCHEUnited States Federal Circuit
Attorney's Fees, Corporation & Enterprise Law, Government ContractsBecause the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals applied the wrong legal standard when disallowing contractor's legal costs of defending a... |
03/15/2002 | 01-1011 |
STANLEY v. PRINCIPIUnited States Federal Circuit
Administrative Law, Attorney's Fees, Government Benefits38 U.S.C. section 5904(c) was designed to allow attorneys' fees in connection with proceedings to reopen a claim on the grounds of new and material... |
03/14/2002 | 01-7017 |
Results 1 to 10 of 19