United States Federal Circuit - October 2001 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 2
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 12
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
NATIONSBANK OF TEXAS, N.A. v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
Tax LawSection 13208 of Title XIII of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, Pub. L. No. 103-66, amending 26 USC 2001(c) to permanently and... |
10/30/2001 | 00-5113 |
SPECIAL DEVICES, INC. v. OEA, INC.United States Federal Circuit
Civil ProcedureA district court's award of attorney fees for an unspecified amount is not a final decision, so the appellate court lacks jurisdiction to hear the... |
10/30/2001 | 01-1201 |
SCALTECH, INC. v. RETEC/TETRA, L.L.C.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentAn offer of commercial exploitation of a process, even if no license or sale of the patent is intended, implicates the on sale bar of 35 USC 102(b),... |
10/23/2001 | 01-1005; 01-1009 |
TURNER v. SEC'Y. OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVS.United States Federal Circuit
Injury & Tort LawThe National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 USC 300aa-1 to 34, provides a presumption that the vaccination caused the exhibited symptoms,... |
10/16/2001 | 01-5043; 01-5054 |
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. THOMPSONUnited States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentBecause 21 US 337(a) limits the ability to seek "delisting" as a form of relief to those actions "by and in the name of the United States", a private... |
10/12/2001 | 01-1257 |
SHAKEPROOF ASSEMBLY COMPONENTS DIV. OF ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS, INC. v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
International Trade19 USC 1677b(c)(1) does not require that the US Dep't of Commerce Int'l Trade Admin. always use surrogate country values, but that the valuation of... |
10/12/2001 | 00-1521 |
ASYST TECHS., INC. v. EMPAK, INC.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentThe corresponding structure to a function set forth in a means-plus-function limitation must actually perform the recited function, not merely enable... |
10/10/2001 | 00-1514 |
BRASSELER, U.S.A. I, L.P. v. STRYKER SALES CORP.United States Federal Circuit
Attorney's Fees, Intellectual Property, PatentWhere the inventors failed to disclose material information to their patent attorneys, and the attorneys failed to conduct an investigation adequate... |
10/09/2001 | 00-1194 |
BALLARD MED. PRODS. v. ALLEGIANCE HEALTHCARE CORP.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentDistrict courts considering patent cases are not required to conduct a detailed, limitation-by-limitation construction of each of the asserted claims,... |
10/09/2001 | 00-1393 |
XEROX CORP. v. 3COM CORP.United States Federal Circuit
Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property, PatentWhere the patent for single stroke symbols (used for improved computer recognition of human handwriting) relies upon both geometric shape and the... |
10/05/2001 | 00-1464 |
Results 1 to 10 of 12