United States Federal Circuit - March 2001 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 3
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 28
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
U.S. ECOLOGY, INC. v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
Government ContractsGovernment's acceptance of payment from a third party that could have benefited from the government contract, if certain conditions are fulfilled,... |
03/30/2001 | 00-5062 |
BUTLER v. PRINCIPIUnited States Federal Circuit
Government BenefitsUnder 38 USC 7105(b), the "presumption of regularity" applies to mailing a copy of a notice of appeal rights to a veteran and does not conflict with... |
03/30/2001 | 00-7084 |
SINGLETON v. MERIT SYS. PROT. BD.United States Federal Circuit
Civil Procedure, Labor & Employment LawEven if plaintiff could prevail on his claim that he was not promoted in reprisal for making a protected disclosure, he lacks an effective remedy... |
03/29/2001 | 99-3341 |
WHITE v. PRINCIPIUnited States Federal Circuit
Government BenefitsAdopting the "treating physician" rule in veterans' benefits cases conflicts with 38 CFR 3.303(a), which requires consideration of the entire record... |
03/27/2001 | 00-7130 |
MARINO v. OFFICE OF PERS. MGMT.United States Federal Circuit
Government Benefits, Labor & Employment LawA "light-duty" assignment to a worker's job or work environment is not an "accommodation" of a disabling condition when seeking disability retirement... |
03/27/2001 | 00-3133 |
PROCHORNENKO v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
Tax LawTaxpayers are not entitled to reduce their partnership tax liability based on the statutory right to a consistent settlement of "partnership items"... |
03/23/2001 | 00-5045 |
INS. CO. OF THE WEST v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
Government ContractsA subrogee may rely on the waiver of sovereign immunity in the Tucker Act, 28 USC 1491, after stepping into the shoes of a government contractor, and... |
03/23/2001 | 00-5039 |
PERRY v. OFFICE OF PERS. MGMT.United States Federal Circuit
Family Law, Government BenefitsBoard's determination that a state divorce decree was a qualifying order 5 USC 8345(j)(1) where ex-spouse was awarded half of the 'value' of the... |
03/22/2001 | 00-3097 |
HITZEMAN v. RUTTERUnited States Federal Circuit
International Law, PatentWhere substantial evidence supports the Board of Patent Appeals' conclusion that appellants did not conceive of particle size and sedimentation rate... |
03/22/2001 | 99-1604, 99-1605 |
KROLL v. FINNERTYUnited States Federal Circuit
Ethics & Disciplinary Code, PatentThe Patent and Trademark Office's ("PTO") authority to regulate patent law before the PTO under 35 USC 2(b)(2)(D) and 35 USC 32 will not preempt a... |
03/22/2001 | 00-1176 |
Results 1 to 10 of 28