United States Federal Circuit
SINGLETON v. MERIT SYS. PROT. BD., 99-3341
Even if plaintiff could prevail on his claim that he was not promoted in reprisal for making a protected disclosure, he lacks an effective remedy because an order of the Merit Systems Protection Board is not enforceable against plaintiff's employer, a state national guard.
Appellate Information
- Decided 03/29/2001
- Published 03/29/2001
Judges
- CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge, Before MICHEL, LOURIE and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Richard B. Reiling, Walsh, Harrison & Reiling, of Dayton, OH, argued for petitioner.
- For Appellees:
- Sara B. Rearden, Attorney, Office of General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief was Martha B. Schneider, Assistant General Counsel.