United States Federal Circuit
KROLL v. FINNERTY, 00-1176
The Patent and Trademark Office's ("PTO") authority to regulate patent law before the PTO under 35 USC 2(b)(2)(D) and 35 USC 32 will not preempt a grievance committee from disciplining an attorney for conduct stemming from the attorney's patent prosecution practice.
Appellate Information
- Decided 03/21/2001
- Published 03/22/2001
Judges
- MICHEL, Circuit Judge., Before MICHEL, Circuit Judge, SMITH, Senior Circuit Judge, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Edwin D. Schindler, of Coram, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Melanie L. Oxhorn, Assistant Solicitor General, Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York, of New York, NY, argued for the defendant-appellee. With her on the brief was Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of the State of New York. Of counsel was Robert K. Drinan, of Mineola, NY.