Supreme Court of California - February 2004 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 1
Showing Result 1 - 9 of 9
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
METRO. WATER DIST. OF S. CALIFORNIA v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY (CARGILL)Supreme Court of California
Government Contracts, Government Law, Labor & Employment Law, Public UtilitiesThe Public Employees' Retirement Law incorporates common law principles into its definition of a contracting agency employee, and requires contracting... |
02/26/2004 | S102371 |
HUSKINSON & BROWN, LLP v. WOLFSupreme Court of California
Attorney's Fees, Contracts, Ethics & Professional ResponsibilityIn the absence of written client consent to an agreement between law firms to divide fees, a law firm that is barred from dividing fees under... |
02/23/2004 | S107616 |
E.M.M.I. INC. v. ZURICH AM. INS. CO.Supreme Court of California
Contracts, Insurance LawA provision in a "jeweler's block" insurance policy excluding from coverage jewelry stolen from a vehicle unless the insured was "actually in or upon... |
02/23/2004 | S109609 |
PEOPLE v. HOLMESSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureWhen taking a conditional plea of guilty or nolo contendere to an accusatory pleading charging a felony, Penal Code section 1192.5 requires the trial... |
02/19/2004 | S102965 |
MARTIN v. SZETOSupreme Court of California
Attorney's Fees, Civil Procedure, Government Law, Injury & Tort LawCode of Civil Procedure section 1021.7 authorizes courts to award attorneys' fees in actions for libel or slander only when a peace officer or an... |
02/19/2004 | S103417 |
RICHMOND v. SHASTA CMTY. SERVS. DIST.Supreme Court of California
Property Law & Real Estate, Public Utilities, Tax Law, Water LawCapacity and fire suppression fees imposed as a condition of making a new connection to a water system, the proceeds of which are used to finance... |
02/09/2004 | S105078 |
PEOPLE v. PENASupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureThe standard oral argument waiver notice of the Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division Two, has a real potential to interfere with a party's proper... |
02/05/2004 | S106906 |
CASA HERRERA, INC. v. BEYDOUNSupreme Court of California
Contracts, Injury & Tort LawTerminations based on the parol evidence rule are favorable for malicious prosecution purposes. |
02/02/2004 | S111998 |
PEOPLE v. DANKSSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingOn automatic appeal, defendant's death sentence is affirmed. |
02/02/2004 | S032146 |
Results 1 to 9 of 9