CASA HERRERA, INC. v. BEYDOUN, S111998
Terminations based on the parol evidence rule are favorable for malicious prosecution purposes.
- Decided 02/02/2004
- Published 02/02/2004
- Supreme Court of California
- For Appellant:
- Meisenheimer, Herron & Steele, Matthew V. Herron, Robert M. Steele; Post Kirby Noonan & Sweat, San Diego, Michael J. Kirby and Matthew P. Nugent for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Julian W. Poon, Gregory D. Brown, Los Angeles, Nicola T. Hanna and Michele L. Maryott, Irvine, for Defendants and Respondents Community First National Bank and Tom Ferrara., Ira S. Carlin, Escondido, for Defendants and Respondents Nasser Beydoun and Am Mex Food Industries, Inc.