California Court of Appeal - December 2003 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 9
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 82
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
ESPINOZA v. CLASSIC PIZZA, INC.California Court of Appeal
Labor & Employment Law
In an action over overtime wages, the judgment in favor of plaintiff is remanded to recalculate plaintiff's gross weekly salaries, overtime hours...
|
12/31/2003 | G030406 |
PEOPLE v. CARBAJALCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Conviction for indecent exposure, Pen. Code section 314(1) is valid where there is no evidence that anyone actually saw defendant's naked genitals, as...
|
12/31/2003 | G031514 |
PEOPLE v. HAMILTONCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Remedies
Neither payments to the victim by the victim's insurance carrier nor payments to the victim by the insurer of defendant's mother may offset...
|
12/30/2003 | B167189 |
STOLMAN v. CITY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Court of Appeal
Property Law & Real Estate, Property Law & Real Estate
The zoning administrator abused her discretion in granting a variance permitting the addition of an automobile detailing service to an existing...
|
12/30/2003 | B164169 |
TAXARA v. GUTIERREZCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
California Code of Regulations, title 17, section 1219.3 does not require a single officer to observe the breath test subject for 15 minutes prior to...
|
12/30/2003 | C043125 |
PEOPLE v. MEDINACalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence
Evidence of a sexual offense for which defendant was not charged was admissible pursuant to Evidence Code section 1108 even though it occurred many...
|
12/30/2003 | D041113 |
PEOPLE v. RENDEROSCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Penal Code section 803(g) does not violate ex post facto principles when it is used to extend the unexpired time in which criminal charges may be...
|
12/30/2003 | A097873, A103588 |
CITI-WIDE PREFERRED COURIERS, INC. v. GOLDEN EAGLE INS. CORP.California Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort Law, Workers' Compensation
Just as a malicious prosecution suit may be maintained where only one of several claims in the underlying action lacked probable cause, so too can a...
|
12/30/2003 | B160823 |
PEOPLE v. WILSONCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Defendant unsuccessfully appeals from his conviction of driving under the influence of alcohol causing bodily injury.
|
12/30/2003 | A102208 |
AM. AIRLINES, INC. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (DIMARCO)California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Evidence, Labor & Employment Law
Neither California nor federal law recognizes a union member communication privilege, and Evidence Code section 911 mandates that courts are not free...
|
12/29/2003 | B162513 |