California Court of Appeal
STOLMAN v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, B164169
The zoning administrator abused her discretion in granting a variance permitting the addition of an automobile detailing service to an existing gasoline station which has a nonconforming use status and which is located in a residential zone. Evidence did not support the required findings of hardship and of deprivation of a use afforded to other properties in the same zone and vicinity.
- Decided 12/30/2003
- Published 12/30/2003
- CHARLES S. VOGEL, P.J.
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Overton, Lyman & Prince, Los Angeles, and Stephen L. Jones, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Rockard J. Delgadillo, City Attorney, Jeri L. Burge, Assistant City Attorney, Ingrid M. Causey and Thomas Ballantine, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendant and Respondent.