California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

STOLMAN v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, B164169

The zoning administrator abused her discretion in granting a variance permitting the addition of an automobile detailing service to an existing gasoline station which has a nonconforming use status and which is located in a residential zone. Evidence did not support the required findings of hardship and of deprivation of a use afforded to other properties in the same zone and vicinity.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/30/2003
  • Published 12/30/2003

Judges

  •  CHARLES S. VOGEL, P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  •  Overton, Lyman & Prince, Los Angeles, and Stephen L. Jones, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Rockard J. Delgadillo, City Attorney, Jeri L. Burge, Assistant City Attorney, Ingrid M. Causey and Thomas Ballantine, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendant and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard