| Description | Date | Docket # |
| People v. Pena California Court of Appeal Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence Defendant-inmates' convictions for assault are reversed where the admission of a codefendant's extrajudicial statement to a police officer violated... |
04/29/2005 | H023394 |
| Gill v. Rich California Court of Appeal Contracts, Health Law, Insurance Law In a receivership action concerning a trust providing an alternative to medical malpractice insurance, an assessment levied onto members of the failed... |
04/29/2005 | B158336 |
| Kangarlou v. Progressive Title Co. California Court of Appeal Attorney's Fees, Contracts, Property Law & Real Estate In a dispute between the buyer of residential property and her escrow agent, denial of plaintiff-buyer's request for attorney fees is reversed where... |
04/29/2005 | B177400 |
| Deborah M. v. Super. Ct. of San Diego County California Court of Appeal Family Law, Juvenile Law Family Code section 3041.5(a) does not permit courts in custody and visitation proceedings to order drug testing, by means of a hair follicle test, of... |
04/29/2005 | D045854 |
| The Roman Cath. Bishop of Oak. v. Super. Ct. of Alameda County California Court of Appeal Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Juvenile Law Code of Civil Procedure section 340.1, which permits a one-year period for the revival of childhood sexual abuse claims that had expired under the... |
04/29/2005 | B179053 |
| Dep't of Alco. Bev. Cont. v. Alco. Bev. Cont. App. Bd. California Court of Appeal Administrative Law, Consumer Protection Law (Industry: Food & Beverage) Defendant's sponsorship payments to an event promoter for co-sponsorship of a race constituted violations of sections 25500(a)(2) and 25503(h) of the... |
04/29/2005 | A107773 |
| Acosta v. Glenfed Dev. Corp. California Court of Appeal Civil Procedure, Construction (Industry: Food & Beverage) In a construction defect action, defendants may not assert the 10-year limitations period in Code of Civil Procedure section 337.15 as a defense where... |
04/29/2005 | B163118 |
| Morris v. Redwood Empire Bancorp California Court of Appeal Banking Law, Constitutional Law, Consumer Protection Law (Industry: Food & Beverage) Federal banking laws and regulations concerning noninterest bank fees do not preempt California's unfair competition law. |
04/29/2005 | G033649 |
| Anolik v. EMC Mortgage Corp. California Court of Appeal Property Law & Real Estate (Industry: Food & Beverage) In a suit to enjoin a foreclosure sale, judgment in favor of defendant is reversed where the trial court erred in determining that the notice of... |
04/29/2005 | C044201 |
| People v. Michael H. California Court of Appeal Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & Procedure, Juvenile Law (Industry: Food & Beverage) Welfare and Institutions Code section 1800, which allows for the continued civil commitment of individuals under the control of the California Youth... |
04/28/2005 | F045191 |