California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

The Roman Cath. Bishop of Oak. v. Super. Ct. of Alameda County, B179053

Code of Civil Procedure section 340.1, which permits a one-year period for the revival of childhood sexual abuse claims that had expired under the statute of limitations, does not violate the ex post facto doctrine.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/29/2005
  • Published 04/29/2005


  • RUBIN, J.


  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellant:
  • Bledsoe, Cathcart, Diestel & Pedersen, Richard S. Diestel, and Alison M. Crane, San Francisco;  Foley & Lardner, and Stephen A. McFeely, Los Angeles;  Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, Christina J. Imre, and Douglas J. Collodel, Los Angeles, for Petitioner., Furtado, Jaspovice & Simons, and Richard J. Simons, Hayward, for Real Party in Interest.

  • For Appellees:
  • No appearance for Respondent.
Copied to clipboard