California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Gill v. Rich, B158336

In a receivership action concerning a trust providing an alternative to medical malpractice insurance, an assessment levied onto members of the failed trust is affirmed where defendants cannot rescind their contracts with the trust.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/29/2005
  • Published 04/29/2005




  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellees:
  • Danning, Gill, Diamond & Kollitz, George E. Schulman, Richard K. Diamond, John J. Bingham and John N. Tedford, IV, Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Respondents., Aguilar & Sebastinelli, Raul V. Aguilar, San Francisco, Allen J. Kent, and Dominic G. Flamiano, for Defendant and Appellant, J. Ronald Rich., Wise Pearce Yocis & Smith and Michael J. Pearce, Long Beach, for Defendant and Appellant, Jehan Zeb Mir.
Copied to clipboard