HUSSEIN v. SESSIONS III (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Gamada Ahmed HUSSEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. Attorney General; U.S. Department of Justice; Christopher Wray,1 Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation; John Does, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-2513

Decided: March 21, 2018

Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Gamada Ahmed Hussein, Pro Se David W. Fuller, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, District of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendants-Appellees

[Unpublished]

Gamada Hussein appeals the district court’s ² dismissal of his civil rights action for failure to state a claim and lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Upon de novo review, we conclude that even assuming the district court had jurisdiction to consider Hussein’s claim under the Privacy Act, the complaint failed to state a claim, and we affirm the dismissal of the remaining claims for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

FOOTNOTES

2. The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Steven E. Rau, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network