Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Roosevelt WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian SMITH, Defendant-Appellee.
ORDER
Roosevelt Williams, an Indiana inmate, appeals the denial of his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the determination of a hearing officer that he possessed cocaine. The district court denied his petition because the officer had sufficient evidence to find Williams guilty. We affirm.
A search of Williams’s cell uncovered three barbecue sauce bottles containing false bottoms that concealed packages of white powder and a green leafy substance. The white powder was tested and classified as cut cocaine. The sergeant who conducted the search wrote a conduct report charging Williams with possessing a controlled substance. A hearing officer found Williams guilty based on the conduct report and test results, and the Superintendent denied his appeal.
Petitioning for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Williams argued that insufficient evidence supported the guilty finding. The district judge denied the petition, concluding that it was reasonable for the hearing officer to credit the conduct report and test results.
On appeal Williams reiterates that the evidence was insufficient to support a guilty finding. But the relevant question is whether there is any evidence in the record that could support the finding. Superintendent, Mass. Corr. Inst., Walpole v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 455–56, 105 S.Ct. 2768, 86 L.Ed.2d 356 (1985). Conduct reports can satisfy that standard, Donelson v. Pfister, 811 F.3d 911, 916 (7th Cir. 2016), and the evidence here also included test results.
To the extent Williams raises any argument about the green leaves hidden in the bottles, such an argument is irrelevant because the hearing officer’s decision was not based on that substance.
We have considered Williams’s other arguments, and none has merit.
AFFIRMED
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-3265
Decided: June 25, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)