Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ronnie McDonald, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Following a bench trial, the court found Ronnie McDonald guilty of the third-degree felony offense of assault with bodily injury on a family member and assessed punishment, enhanced by a prior conviction of assault on a family member with bodily injury, at ten years in prison. See Act of May 31, 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., ch. 665, § 2, 2009 Tex. Gen. Laws 1487, 1488 (current version at Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.01(b)(2)(A) (West 2011)).
McDonald's court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App.1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App.1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App.1969). McDonald received a copy of counsel's brief and was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. McDonald did not file a pro se brief and did not request an extension of time.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex.Crim.App.2009); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex.Crim.App.2005). We agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted.
However, we conclude that the August 10, 2011 judgment of conviction contains a clerical error, listing the statute for offense as “22.01(d)(3) Penal Code.” This Court has the authority to modify incorrect judgments when the necessary information is available to do so. See Tex.R.App. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27–28 (Tex.Crim.App.1993); see also Brooks v. State, No. 03–08–00114–CR, 2008 Tex.App. LEXIS 6216, at *2–3 (Tex.App.—Austin Aug. 14, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (modifying judgment to correct citation). Accordingly, we modify the judgment to reflect the proper citation to the statute for the third-degree felony offense of assault with bodily injury on a family member, which is “22.01(b)(2) Penal Code.” As modified, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Modified and, as Modified,
Jeff Rose, Justice
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: NO. 03–11–00540–CR
Decided: March 30, 2012
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)