all - Opinion Summaries
Page 95 of 96
Showing Result 941 - 950 of 959
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
MOHAVE VALLEY IRRIGATION & DRAINAGE DIST v. NORTONUnited States Ninth Circuit
Government ContractsWater contract setting forth amount of water federal government would deliver to the land in water district also includes water delivered to holders... |
04/11/2001 | 99-16927 |
E. QUINCY SERV. DIST. v. GEN. ACCIDENT INS. CO. OF AM.California Court of Appeal
Government ContractsSurety to construction contractor in government contract must pay contractor's wage and hour deficiencies because the contractor is the surety's... |
04/05/2001 | C033482 |
U.S. ECOLOGY, INC. v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
Government ContractsGovernment's acceptance of payment from a third party that could have benefited from the government contract, if certain conditions are fulfilled,... |
03/30/2001 | 00-5062 |
US v. ORLEANS PARISH SCH. BD.United States Fifth Circuit
Government ContractsA local government entity such as the School Board is not a person subject to liability under the False Claims Act, 31 USC 3729, et seq. |
03/28/2001 | 99-30550, 99-30668 |
INS. CO. OF THE WEST v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
Government ContractsA subrogee may rely on the waiver of sovereign immunity in the Tucker Act, 28 USC 1491, after stepping into the shoes of a government contractor, and... |
03/23/2001 | 00-5039 |
US v. HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO.United States Ninth Circuit
Government Contracts, Injury & Tort LawSection 3730(b)(5) of the False Claims Act establishes an exception-free, first-to-file bar and preempts subsequent actions based on the same facts... |
03/22/2001 | 00-55328 |
BARRETT REFINING CORP. v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
Government ContractsGrant of quantum valebant relief is proper where valuation was based on products actually delivered by plaintiff to the government, but government may... |
03/13/2001 | 00-5036 |
SCHISM v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
Government Benefits, Government Contracts, Military LawWhere recruiters made promises of lifetime free health care to armed forces members who served twenty years, the implied-in-fact contract is binding... |
02/09/2001 | 99-1402 |
RANDA/MADISON JOINT VENTURE III v. DAHLBERGUnited States Federal Circuit
Government ContractsGovernment contractors have a duty to review material information explicitly referred to in the contract, even if not included in the actual contract. |
02/07/2001 | 00-1129 |
BRILEY v. NAT'L ARCHIVES & RECORDS ADMIN.United States Federal Circuit
Government Contracts, Labor & Employment LawWhere the agency shows by clear and convincing evidence that it would not have reclassified petitioner-s position, even absent the whistleblower... |
01/23/2001 | 99-3413 |
Results 941 to 950 of 959