United States Federal Circuit
BRILEY v. NAT'L ARCHIVES & RECORDS ADMIN., 99-3413
Where the agency shows by clear and convincing evidence that it would not have reclassified petitioner-s position, even absent the whistleblower disclosures, the Merit Systems Protection Board's decision to reject a claim for retaliation was correct.
Appellate Information
- Decided 01/23/2001
- Published 01/23/2001
Judges
- DYK, Circuit Judge., Before NEWMAN, LINN, and DYK, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Karen K. Howard,The Law Offices of Karen K. Howard, P.C., of Kansas City, Missouri, argued for petitioner.
- For Appellees:
- John C. Einstman, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. On the brief were David W. Ogden, Assistant Attorney General; David M. Cohen, Director; Harold D. Lester, Jr., Assistant Director; and Katherine A. Barski, Attorney. Of counsel on the brief was Amy E. Krupsky, Attorney, Office of General Counsel, National Archives & Records Administration, of College Park, Maryland.