all - Opinion Summaries
Page 946 of 981
Showing Result 9451 - 9460 of 9802
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
A.I. CREDIT CORP. v. LEGION INS. CO.United States Seventh Circuit
Injury & Tort LawBecause Indiana law permits as much reliance as is reasonable, a defendant cannot obtain summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff had no... |
09/14/2001 | 00-3848 |
WSOL v. FIDUCIARY MGMT. ASSOCS., INC.United States Seventh Circuit
Injury & Tort LawEven if the fiduciary did not exercise due care in choosing to work with associates of a shady character, the plaintiff cannot prevail without showing... |
09/14/2001 | 00-2703; 01-1685 |
KEARNEY v. J.P. KING AUCTION CO., INC.United States First Circuit
Injury & Tort LawAssertions that at auction property would sell for between $3 and $10 million and that the auction would attract "heavy hitters" are not actionable... |
09/13/2001 | 00-1837; 00-1910 |
GOUTY v. SCHNEPELSupreme Court of Florida
Civil Procedure, Injury & Tort LawWhere a plaintiff has released a settling defendant allegedly jointly and severally liable for economic damages, the settlement proceeds may not be... |
09/13/2001 | sc00-1853 |
BOONE v. BARNESUnited States Eighth Circuit
Injury & Tort LawUnder Missouri law, a police officer's observations of the driver and opinion that alcohol dissipates at a certain rate over time alone is... |
09/10/2001 | 00-6105 |
DREIBLATT v. ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INS. CO.United States First Circuit
Injury & Tort Law, Insurance LawUnder Massachusetts law, the collapse of a roof involves suddenness, a perceptible change in appearance, and completeness, so evidence of internal... |
09/10/2001 | 01-1037 |
JKC HOLDING CO. LLC v. WASHINGTON SPORTS VENTURES, INC.United States Fourth Circuit
Contracts, Injury & Tort LawOpinions and predictions of what a party hopes or anticipates will happen are not statements of material fact, and where the other party continues... |
09/07/2001 | 00-2511 |
FORD v. GACS, INC.United States Eighth Circuit
Injury & Tort LawMissouri law does not accept the consumer expectations test to determine whether a product is unreasonably dangerous in product liability claims. |
09/07/2001 | 00-1043 |
LONG v. COTTRELL, INC.United States Eighth Circuit
Injury & Tort LawProduct liability does not apply to an auto manufacturer for injuries resulting from the use of car carriers where it did not manufacture or sell the... |
09/07/2001 | 00-3628 |
LOVEJOY v. AT&T CORP.California Court of Appeal
Communications Law, Injury & Tort LawAn allegation of "slamming", where plaintiff alleges that a phone carrier transferred his telephone number without his consent or knowledge, is... |
09/05/2001 | C034423 |
Results 9451 to 9460 of 9802