LOVEJOY v. AT&T CORP., C034423
An allegation of "slamming", where plaintiff alleges that a phone carrier transferred his telephone number without his consent or knowledge, is sufficient to support a claim of fraud under California law and is not preempted by the filed rate doctrine.
- Decided 09/05/2001
- Published 09/05/2001
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Law Offices of Mark C. Barulich and Mark C. Barulich, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Watson, Khachadourian Re & Iams, Sacramento, and Kevin R. Iams for Defendant and Appellant.