California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

LOVEJOY v. AT&T CORP., C034423

An allegation of "slamming", where plaintiff alleges that a phone carrier transferred his telephone number without his consent or knowledge, is sufficient to support a claim of fraud under California law and is not preempted by the filed rate doctrine.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/05/2001
  • Published 09/05/2001

Judges

  • CALLAHAN, J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  •  Law Offices of Mark C. Barulich and Mark C. Barulich, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Watson, Khachadourian Re & Iams, Sacramento, and Kevin R. Iams for Defendant and Appellant.
Copied to clipboard