all - Opinion Summaries
Page 755 of 782
Showing Result 7541 - 7550 of 7814
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
GEN. ACCIDENT INS. CO. v. UNITY/WATERFORD-FAIR OAKS, LTD.United States Fifth Circuit
Contracts, Insurance Law, Property Law & Real EstateWhere commercial insurance policy specifically excluded coverage for damage to underground pipes, and clear evidence showed additional damage caused... |
04/10/2002 | 01-50328 |
SOVAK v. CHIGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO.United States Ninth Circuit
Contracts, Dispute Resolution & Arbitration, Health LawWhen an underlying agreement contains only a general state choice-of-law clause, federal law governs the right to compel arbitration, and state law... |
04/10/2002 | 00-55298 |
IN RE: BASSETTUnited States Ninth Circuit
Bankruptcy Law, Contracts, Debt CollectionReaffirmation agreement was enforceable, the "right to rescind" statement therein being "clear and conspicuous" under the circumstances so that... |
04/09/2002 | 01-35001, 01-31058 |
CHEVRON USA, INC. v. EL-KHOURYUnited States Ninth Circuit
Contracts, Corporation & Enterprise Law, Oil and Gas Law, Tax LawIn an action for termination of franchise, summary judgment for plaintiff was improper where a question of fact existed as to whether failure to pay... |
04/09/2002 | 00-57126 |
CARWASH OF AMERICA-PO, LLC v. WINDSWEPT VENTURES NO. ICalifornia Court of Appeal
Contracts, RemediesAfter obtaining summary judgment on breach of contract claims, defendants sought reimbursement for expert witness fees, but court held that where... |
04/09/2002 | C035179 |
KEROBO v. SOUTHWESTERN CLEAN FUELS CORP.United States Sixth Circuit
Civil Procedure, ContractsIn determining propriety of venue, a contract's forum-selection clause is one of a number of case-specific factors which the court must weigh; a venue... |
04/09/2002 | 00-1201 |
NEW COMM WIRELESS SERVS., INC. v. SPRINTCOM, INC.United States First Circuit
Communications Law, Contracts, Injury & Tort LawBecause there was no showing, on tortious interference claim, that defendant intended to interfere with plaintiff's contract(s) knowing that such... |
04/05/2002 | 01-2541, 01-2603 |
NAT. TECH. SYS. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY (UNITED PAC. INS. CO.)California Court of Appeal
Attorney's Fees, Contracts, Insurance LawA surety is not bound by a judgment against its principal in a prior action to which surety was not a party, and therefore, surety here is not bound... |
04/04/2002 | B152512 |
DIOSDADO v. DIOSDADOCalifornia Court of Appeal
Contracts, Family LawA contract entered into between a husband and wife, providing for payment of liquidated damages in the event one of them is sexually unfaithful to the... |
04/04/2002 | B150941 |
WACKEEN v. MALISCalifornia Court of Appeal
Attorney's Fees, Civil Procedure, ContractsBecause the formal requirements for retention of jurisdiction to consider a Civil Code section 664.6 motion were not met by the parties, plaintiff was... |
04/04/2002 | B131353, B132671, B138921 |
Results 7541 to 7550 of 7814