all - Opinion Summaries

Abbott Laboratories v. Cordis Corporation

Constitutional Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
District court properly granted defendant's motion to quash two subpoenas duces tecum, where: 1) 35 U.S.C. section 24 only empowers a district court...

Frolow v. Wilson Sporting Goods Company

Commercial Law, Contracts, Intellectual Property, Patent, Sports Law
Judgment for defendant in suit alleging breach of license agreement and patent infringement involving tennis rackets, is: 1) reversed in part, where...

Synqor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc.

Commercial Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
Judgment for plaintiff finding defendants infringed on its patents related to its power converter systems is affirmed, where: 1) defendants did not...

Aristocrat Technologies v. International Game Technology

Commercial Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
Summary judgment granted to defendants on plaintiffs' allegations that defendants casino gaming devices and methods for awarding a progressive prize...

In re Hubbell

Drugs & Biotech, Intellectual Property, Patent
The rejection of patent claims related to tissue repair and regeneration by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) is affirmed, where...

Radio Systems Corp v. Lalor

Intellectual Property, Patent
Summary judgment that plaintiffs did not infringe two of defendant's patents on improvements to electronic animal collars is: 1) affirmed in part as...

Move, Inc. v. Real Estate Alliance Ltd.

Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property, Patent, Property Law & Real Estate
Summary judgment that plaintiff did not infringe claim 1 of defendant's '989 patent related to methods for locating available real estate properties...

Brilliant Instruments, Inc. v. Guidetech, LLC

Intellectual Property, Patent
Summary judgment that plaintiff did not infringe defendant's patents relating to circuits that measure the timing errors of digital signals in...

Gunn v. Minton

Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Intellectual Property, Patent, Legal Malpractice
28 U.S.C. section 1338(a), which provides federal district courts with exclusive jurisdiction over patent cases, does not deprive the state courts of...

Cephalon, Inc. v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Intellectual Property, Patent
Judgment for defendant in patent infringement suit is: 1) affirmed in part where the district court did not clearly err in finding that defendant's...